Daily Star logoOpinions
Bacolod City, PhilippinesFriday, January 20, 2012
Front Page
Negros Oriental
Star Business
Opinion
Sports
Police Beat
Star Life
People & Events
Eguide
Events
Schedules
Obituaries
Congratulations
Classified Ads
 
Startoon by Roy Aguilar
Opinion Columns
Twinkling with Ninfa R. Leonardia
From the Center with Rolly Espina
The Good Life with Eli F.J. Tajanlangit
TIGHT ROPE with Modesto Sa-onoy
Google
 
Web www.visayandailystar.com
Editorial

The SALN, the SALN!

Daily Star logo
Published by the Visayan Daily Star Publications, Inc.
NINFA R. LEONARDIA
Editor-in-Chief & President

CARLA P. GOMEZ
Editor

GUILLERMO TEJIDA III
Desk Editor
PATRICK PANGILINAN
Busines Editor

NIDA A. BUENAFE

Sports Editor
RENE GENOVE
Bureau Chief, Dumaguete
MAJA P. DELY
Advertising Coordinator

CARLOS ANTONIO L. LEONARDIA
Administrative Officer

When Republic Act 6730 or the law requiring all government officials and employees to submit a statement of their assets, liabilities and networth every fiscal year, most of those covered protested, believing it to be just another cumbersome item that would only add to their paperwork.

Under this law, those covered have to submit on the required government form all their existing assets such as land, houses, jewelry, appliances, and all other forms of property they own as of the filing year, as well as their liabilities, or amounts they owe. This they accomplish and submit only after they have signed and sworn to its veracity and have it notarized by the proper officials.

The intent of the law was to keep track of the assets, income and liabilities of all government workers to ensure that what wealth and possessions they have are honestly acquired, and that they do not possess ill-gotten wealth. As stated in the law, all those who work for and are paid by the government have the obligation, without exception, to comply with it. And so everyone of them, or so it was believed, faithfully submitted such documents, now referred to as the SALN, under pain of sanctions or even prosecution.

It was therefore a shock to everyone to learn that the Supreme Court, on its own, and obviously in the belief that its officials are a class of their own, had issued a ruling prohibiting the disclosure of such documents accomplished by its members. And that is why the Senate-Court now trying the Chief Justice for various charges, had to demand the presentation of the SALN of the Chief Justice during the trial.

So far, the information shown on the SALNs covering a period of about ten years, are very revealing, indeed. How these will affect the outcome of the present legal exercise, we cannot be certain yet. But at least this case has confirmed that the SALN is living up to the intent of its proponents that transparency is one of the main keys in ensuring that government officials and employees are monitored in the way they acquire wealth and property.*

 

 
 Email: visayandailystar@yahoo.com